StringBuffer. Often we need to append many strings and form a larger, single string. With the String class this is slow. Many copies are done.
With StringBuffer, though, no copies are required after an append operation. The buffer within StringBuffer is mutable, changeable. We can convert it to a String with toString.
An example. We create a new instance of the String Buffer class and add ints and chars (spaces) to it. We append() in a loop. Often StringBuffer is used within loops.
Detail Please notice how we call the append method. We call append() on the result of another call.
Note The append method returns an instance of the StringBuffer when it is done internally appending.
import java.lang.StringBuffer;
public class Program {
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Create new StringBuffer.
StringBuffer buffer = new StringBuffer();
// Append three ints and spaces.
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
buffer.append(i).append(' ');
}
System.out.println(buffer);
}
}0 1 2
Benchmark. A StringBuffer is slower than a StringBuilder because it performs threading checks. In this benchmark I test this speed difference. I append 100,000 times to each class.
Version 1 This version of the code appends to the StringBuffer many times. It appends integers and chars.
Version 2 This code uses the StringBuilder class and appends the same values as version 1.
Result The StringBuffer took over twice as much time. So the StringBuilder, in this situation, is a clear win.
Note Other than the class name, the methods called here (append) are the same. They have equivalent effects.
import java.lang.StringBuilder;
import java.lang.StringBuffer;
public class Program {
public static void main(String[] args) {
long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
// Version 1: append to StringBuffer.
StringBuffer buffer = new StringBuffer();
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
buffer.append(i).append(' ');
}
long t2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
// Version 2: append to StringBuilder.
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
builder.append(i).append(' ');
}
long t3 = System.currentTimeMillis();
// ... Times.
System.out.println(t2 - t1);
System.out.println(t3 - t2);
}
}14 ms, StringBuffer
6 ms, StringBuilder
Concepts. The newer type, StringBuilder, is preferable for speed. It performs over twice as fast in the benchmark. When no threads are involved, this is an easy speedup.
For the rare case when thread safety is needed when appending, StringBuffer is still useful. It works in nearly the same way as StringBuilder for appends and other operations.
Dot Net Perls is a collection of pages with code examples, which are updated to stay current. Programming is an art, and it can be learned from examples.
Donate to this site to help offset the costs of running the server. Sites like this will cease to exist if there is no financial support for them.
Sam Allen is passionate about computer languages, and he maintains 100% of the material available on this website. He hopes it makes the world a nicer place.